Search for: "Poon v. Poon" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
Kat friend Shawn Poon describes the recent dispute in Singapore over the university name "Harvard". [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2015, Mew J in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the libel case of Bernstein v Poon 2015 ONSC 155. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
Kat friend Shawn Poon from Singapore discusses a recent decision there that tackles one of the perennially vexing issues of trademark law, namely when does a variant form of a registered mark not count as use. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:49 am
Kat friend Shawn Poon from One Legal LLC in Singapore reports below on an interesting decision by the Court of Appeal in Singapore on consumer “indifference” to the mark used. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 10:55 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Turning to functionality, Arnold provides a detailed account of the law from Navitaire v EasyJet, Nova v Mazooma and of course SAS v WPL. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:36 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Poon introduced the growing topic of accommodation of family status in the workplace. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:03 am
By December 2008, Newsweek reported that the size of the market amounted to US$600 trillion[v], an exponential increase when compared with the size the market had in 1993 and 2006. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
Pix: Texwinca Holdings LtdOn 6 June 2018, the Council on Ethics recommended to exclude the company Texwinca Holdings Ltd from the Government Pension Fund due to an unacceptable risk of the company being responsible for systematic human rights violations.Texwinca is a Chinese company that produces yarn, knitted fabrics and garments. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicol J heard an application in the case of Depp v News Group Newspapers. [read post]