Search for: "Porter v. District of Columbia"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
New York: Columbia University Press, 1989.Relevant BibliographiesThe History, Theory & Praxis of the Left in the 1960s [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:52 pm
Inter alia, he created the “narrow individual right” theory of the Second Amendment, which was later popularized by historian Saul Cornell and earned four votes in the Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Claeyssen of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, District of Columbia (Carter G. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Claeyssen of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, District of Columbia (Carter G. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Sterling Drug, Inc., 416 F.2d 417, 426 (2d Cir. 1969).District of Columbia: McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:01 pm
When I teach Cyberlaw, I include Porter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D Florida on motions to stay pending re-examination: Fusilamp LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
District of Columbia, 20-331, involves D.C. and Maryland’s domestic emoluments clause challenge to Trump’s ownership interests in hotels and restaurants, and specifically the availability of the writ of mandamus to correct claimed errors. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (2007) (see denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:09 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit) affirmed. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
District of Columbia, 747 A.2d 138145 (D.C. 2000); Mervin v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held below, or leaves immunity intact, as the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
[Disclosure: Arnold & Porter is among the counsel to the plaintiffs in this case.] [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
See generally Bexis' book §2.04[1] at footnote 17 (collecting state-of-the-art citations from drug and device cases in 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico).So that's one thing - one pretty big thing - that we think is wrong with the anti-preemption rationale in Tucker II. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Indeed, this bias from inadequate control of confounding infects several pending pharmaceutical multi-district litigations. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
What it had was a bench of three federal district court judges, all conservatives appointed by Republican Presidents. [read post]
