Search for: "Powder Company v. Powder Works"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
Despite an executive order ending contracts with private prison companies, these persist through “work-around” third-party agreements. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Shell Oil Company (1970) 2 Cal.3d 245, 248); wholesalers and distributors (Barth v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:27 am
Hisley v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:23 pm
The case is Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 1:34 pm
[2] Canada (Treasury Board) v. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 8:11 pm
How does that work? [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Electric Light Co v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 6:56 am
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 11:08 am
Hercules Powder Co. (1965) 237 Cal.App.2d 44 and Barth v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:18 am
More here.The High Court in London has found that the patterns on the lid of a make-up powder palette and embossed on the powder itself could constitute protectable copyright works. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:13 pm
Patricia Schmitz v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
| Join the UK IPO working group on IP enforcement [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
In this case, Charlotte Tilbury successfully proved copyright infringement of 2 artistic works by Aldi: first, their ‘Starburst design’, which decorated the lid of the package containing two makeup powders; and the ‘Powder design', embossed into the separate makeup powders in the package (pictured). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 2:22 pm
New Image Global, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 7:44 am
Hyundai Motor America v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:37 am
Youngevity Int’l v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:34 am
The lock-out chips on a toner cartridge control access to fine carbon powders -- not copyrighted works. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:40 am
Additional delays will not work to your advantage. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:40 am
That case is Sterns v. [read post]
