Search for: "Powell v. Secretary of State"
Results 21 - 40
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
Hounslow v Powell; Leeds v Hall; Birmingham v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8 [This is probably a work in progress. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 6:23 am
Responses from Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State and the Democratic National Committee are due by March 15. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:31 am
Indeed, under Powell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2006] EWCA Civ 1279, at para. 146, per Laws LJ).Thus, to give some examples, the exclusion of all actions in nuisance (a tort) in relation to the noise from Heathrow Airport was accepted by the ECtHR as removing the potential claimants’ ‘civil rights’ (Powell and Rayner v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
As former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld infamously said (in a very bad context): “You go to war with the Army you have—not the Army you might wish you have. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
Secretary of State Colin Powell’s undertaking that the MNF-I would engage in “internment where this is necessary for imperative reasons of security,” among other things. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
Moses LJ cites R (JL) v Secretary of State for Defence [2012] EWHC 2216 (Admin) as an example of a proportionality assessment being conducted in JR (our note here, this decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal: [2013] EWCA Civ 449).Nor did s.5, 1977 Act, apply so that the detailed requirements for NTQs needed to be followed. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:08 am
Moses LJ cites R (JL) v Secretary of State for Defence [2012] EWHC 2216 (Admin) as an example of a proportionality assessment being conducted in JR (our note here, this decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal: [2013] EWCA Civ 449).Nor did s.5, 1977 Act, apply so that the detailed requirements for NTQs needed to be followed. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 11:29 pm
To cite just 2 examples, on June 5, 2004, Colin Powell, then the United States' Secretary of State, wrote in a letter to Lauro L. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
The Secretary of State, through the Treasury Solicitor, considers that this issue has been answered in Pinnock and Powell. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
The Secretary of State, through the Treasury Solicitor, considers that this issue has been answered in Pinnock and Powell. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 9:08 am
Nevada v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 1:37 am
Could the Senate say that the return is invalid because it did not conform to state law (were the Secretary of State to decline to sign the relevant document, even if experts in state law asserted that his signature was unnecessary to make the document effective as a matter of state law)? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm
Thornton, 514 U.S. 779 (1995); Powell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
The question was whether "if the secretary of state has reasonable cause to believe" could be read as "if the secretary of state thinks he has reasonable cause to believe". [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
Thornton, 514 U.S. 779, 783 (1995) (first quoting Powell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 8:31 am
We were told that the drawings of the supposed mobile weapons lab in Iraq, used by then Secretary of State Colin Powell before the UN Security Council, were first shown to the German Parliament, which decided that they were an insufficient basis for invasion. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
