Search for: "Power of Few LLC v. Does 1-19"
Results 21 - 40
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Table of Contents and Excerpt from Rzeslawski's article on the implications of Madden v Midland for post-crash consumer remedies against predatory lending that occurred years earlier 786 F.3d 246 (2015)Saliha MADDEN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.No. 14-2131-cv.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.Argued:… [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 2:04 pm
In Liberty Media Holdings LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:04 am
[Rescheduled for April 19, 2011] FPL Farming Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:48 am
On November 1 the Department of Justice announced a settlement with Rite Aid Corporation that calls for Rite Aid to make its Covid 19 vaccination portal accessible by making it conform to WCAG 2.1 AA. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
Code §§ 7448-7467 does not intrude on the Legislature’s workers’ compensation authority and does not violate the single-subject rule, but declares that portions of the law are invalid on separation of powers grounds) Earley v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am
[13] Merit Brief of Amicus Curiae Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost in Support of Neither Party, TWISM Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
The Court has turned away each such challenge (most recently in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
__________ ToNorges Bank5 April 2016Recommendation to exclude Duke Energy Corp., Duke Energy Carolinas LLC, Duke Energy Progress LLC and Progress Energy Inc. from the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) Confidential pursuant to section 13 subsection 1 of the Freedom of Information Act, cf section 3-4 subsection 1 of the Securities Trading Act.Summary The Council on Ethics for the Government Pension Fund Global recommends the exclusion of Duke… [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:53 am
In Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
Tam (decided, June 19) Matal v. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm
In Borealis Power Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The Final Rule specifically identifies and describes the following factors as relevant to the economic reality standard: 1. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 9:58 am
See, e.g., SSDD, LLC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 04123-19 Philips v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03262-19 Bromley v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08073-18 A woman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 11 Victims of sexual assault (2018), No breach-… [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
In KT4 Partners LLC v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
The Court has weighed in on quite a few blockbuster religion clause cases since Wrestling was published. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
In response, Stacy's parents took her to a Y.M.C.A. in Philadelphia and told her that she must stay there and get a job.After a few days, Stacy asked for permission to return home. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
The Purdue Pharma case does not stand alone. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am
This could be done by inserting a new section 41.1(5) (based upon current numbering) along the following lines:For greater certainty, it is deemed always to have been the law that s. 41.1(1) does not apply to any acts permitted by sections 29, 29.1 and 29.2.[4] 6. [read post]
