Search for: "Powers v. Common Council"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,325
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
Rejecting this assertion of nonreviewability, the panel cited to the Supreme Court’s decision in the 1993 case Haitian Centers Council v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
Power Co., 406 F. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:24 am
The Labour Appeal Court has recently restated the law on common mistake as it applies to having a settlement agreement set aside in Murray and Roberts (Pty) Ltd v The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration & Others. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:24 pm
EA v GA & Westminster City Council & Salford City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 586 [Not on Bailii, transcript on Lawtel] This is a little outside our usual grounds, but as it concerns the Court's power to direct Local Authorities to accommodate a child and parent, and has interplay with S.20 Children Act 1989, it is worth a note. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:24 pm
EA v GA & Westminster City Council & Salford City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 586 [Not on Bailii, transcript on Lawtel] This is a little outside our usual grounds, but as it concerns the Court's power to direct Local Authorities to accommodate a child and parent, and has interplay with S.20 Children Act 1989, it is worth a note. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:04 pm
Common Assembly of the ECSC, at page 58, Joined Cases 32/58 and 33/58 SNUPAT v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:23 pm
My first ever venture into the Court of Appeal and the Law Reports was Rimmer v Liverpool City Council [1983] EWCA Civ 11. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:20 am
[Note - I have now been told it is S.25 of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1973 provides (as amended by s.4 of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1983) and given case reference Hyde Park Residence Ltd v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 11:35 am
The Competition Council’s position, among other things, is that granting the Bureau formal market study powers is not likely to be effective in enhancing competition in Canada and would divert the Bureau’s limited resources away from enforcement. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:38 am
The much-anticipated decision in R(Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council (2021) EWHC 578 (Admin) has arrived, confirming that in an emergency, “Everyone In” really does mean everyone. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
” This includes the power, vested in judicial councils, to “make ‘all necessary orders for the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:25 pm
The Court recalled its classic case law according to which Article 308 EC may be used as the legal basis for a measure only where no other provision of the EC Treaty gives the EU institutions the necessary power to adopt it (Case C-84/94 United Kingdom v Council [1996] ECR I-5755, paragraph 48 (working time directive case); Case C-22/96 Parliament v Council [1998] ECR I-3231, paragraph 22; and Case C-436/03 Parliament v Council [2006]… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
At most, they suggest that the Privy Council might have possessed some residual power to revoke patents to address wartime necessities. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:27 am
R (o.t.a Guardian Newspapers) v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:09 am
It is uncertain whether the GST Council will enact a delegated legislation to give effect to such a power. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:04 am
The Supreme Court considers the judgment in Hall & Co Ltd v Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council[1964] 1 WLR 240, which considered the circumvention of the relevant compulsory purchase regime by a purported planning condition. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 9:11 am
The unusual case, now on appeal but also absent from the Court of Appeals web-based index, has only come to light because a maverick Racine Common Council member [Sandy Weidner] got tired of what she calls growing secrecy and concentrated power in her local government. [read post]
