Search for: "Powers v. Fox Television Stations, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
Women, who comprise 51% of the population, own 4.97% of television stations, and minorities, who comprise of 33% of the population, own 3.26% of all stations. [27] In addition, media diversity is believed to be an important check on government power. [28] IV. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2009) The question here is whether a court must defer under Chevron to an agency’s interpretation of a statutory ambiguity that concerns the scope of the agency’s statutory authority (that is, its jurisdiction). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Turning to ABC’s assertion that the final rule is arbitrary and capricious, the court first rejected the argument that the revised regulations were subject to heightened review under the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in FCC v Fox Television Stations, Inc. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 5:59 pm by Joy Waltemath
Turning to ABC’s assertion that the final rule is arbitrary and capricious, the court first rejected the argument that the revised regulations were subject to heightened review under the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in FCC v Fox Television Stations, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am by Eugene Volokh
The Act is therefore far more like the ordinance in Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Will Baude
Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 525-26 (2009) (plurality opinion). [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:02 am
Fox Television Stations, et al., 07-582). [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Kenya The Government shutdown down three television stations after they tried to broadcast images of the opposition leader’s mock inauguration, a ceremony considered treasonous. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Justice O’Connor wrote the 8-0-1 1991 opinion in Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm by David Lat
Fox Television Stations, Inc.: This is the First Amendment “fleeting expletives” case. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm by Lowell Brown
Judging by the increased use of tools, fans, and followers, they are making some very powerful new connections. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
  That could be accomplished through law and regulation, of course, and there are examples in the law of ways in which such laws balance incentives and interests, e.g., compulsory licensing schemes for cable TV stations retransmitting copyrighted content. [read post]