Search for: "Powers v. Jones"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,739
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:10 am
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
Jones (1997). [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm
That’s because unless cities have somewhere for displaced unhoused residents to go, the 2018 appellate case Martin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
Surveillance A coalition of disability rights activists and human rights organisations, including the Child Poverty Action Group and Big Brother Watch, have called on the government to scrap its plans to introduce powers which would allow it to spy on the bank accounts of benefit claimants for the purpose of reducing welfare fraud the Guardian reports. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 10:18 am
Star v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 3:55 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (District Court), in the case styled National Small Business Association v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
Surveillance On 28 February 2024, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal hearing the complaint lodged by journalists Barry McCaffrey and Trevor Birney against UK police authorities was adjourned the day it started due to late disclosure of police evidence. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:15 am
In Howard Jones Investments, LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
Surveillance The Investigatory Powers (Amendment) Bill had its second reading in the House of Commons this week, after being introduced in the Lords last November. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
[How private universities can use Boy Scouts v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
Lord Leggatt, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lady Rose made the majority decision. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:09 am
Jones (April 17) – Whether the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Jones-Doherty, Morally Regulatable Lives: Corporate Sovereignty, the Rise of Burwell v. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
