Search for: "Powers v. Mississippi" Results 21 - 40 of 847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
Appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981, she would go on to write 645 opinions, including landmark decisions upholding gender equality (1982’s Mississippi University for Women v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:07 am by Candace Milner
Southern States with Jim Crow histories are still relying on moral turpitude laws and the Shelby v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:44 am by Peter Mahler
The opening paragraph in the Mississippi Court of Appeals’ opinion in Colson v Warren, 2021-CA-01408-COA (Miss. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  The list of states that have enacted such legislation in 2023 includes Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, and Virginia—an additional 20 states have introduced bills that would regulate foreign ownership of real estate if enacted.[2] In this post, we discuss: The typical contours of state legislation relating to certain foreign real estate activities; The emerging… [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:11 am by Berniard Law Firm
Three tug boats, the M/V Miss Dorothy, the M/V Angela Rae, and the M/V Freedom, plied the Mississippi River with a barge boat in tow. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”But if Tony Clark’s case is any indication, the Mississippi prosecutors and the state supreme court did not get the message. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
Garland, in which the justices will consider whether federal courts have the power to review an agency’s determination that a noncitizen did not meet the “exceptional and extremely unusual” hardship requirement to cancel deportation; Campos-Chaves v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The district court granted the government’s motion to dismiss, holding that the MRT is a “taxation of income” falling within Congress’s power under the 16th Amendment. [read post]