Search for: "Pratte v. Cir" Results 21 - 40 of 57
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 11:46 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Pratt & Whitney Power Systems, 272 Fed.Appx. 78 (2d Cir. 2008).A quick Lexis search shows that the "stigmatizing stereotypes" theory has been applied in the Court of Appeals on few occasions, including the Criley decision cited in this case. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued its ruling in the case of Adinolfe, et. at. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
In order to be non-essential, it must be found not to be essential under both questions.[354] This interpretation is consistent with the approach taken by the Federal Court of Appeal in Halford v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir.2009); Warsoldier, 418 F.3d at 993–94; Pratt, 65 F.3d at 805 (9th Cir.1995); Fed.R.Civ.P. 65. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:11 am
Pratt, 286 Mont. 156, 951 P.2d 37, 43-44 (Mont. 1997) (DUI); State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:54 am
" Id. at 807-08, quoting Pratt v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Cir. 1986) ....................... 41, 48, 50 Statutes 11 U.S.C. [read post]