Search for: "President Judge Determination Cases" Results 21 - 40 of 9,259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Under section 10A(5) of the Defamation Act 2005, the court is required to determine the serious harm issue “as soon as practicable before the trial commences unless satisfied that there are special circumstances justifying the postponement of the determination to a later stage of the proceedings (including during the trial)” [9]. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm by Barbara Pfeffer Billauer
Chevron opponents claim that agency decisions are politically motivated, while judicial determinations are made by “independent judges. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
” Similarly, at NSC, despite acknowledging that the dissident had made a case for change, Vanguard “question[ed] whether the case for change (with its associate risks of disruption) outweighed the benefits of exercising patience with the incumbent board. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
” Similarly, at NSC, despite acknowledging that the dissident had made a case for change, Vanguard “question[ed] whether the case for change (with its associate risks of disruption) outweighed the benefits of exercising patience with the incumbent board. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Spero
President Biden recently signed Executive Order 14,110, titled “Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
  Partly, this is just a mood, i.e., the expectation that Texas judges presiding over cases involving Texas employer Elon Musk, under the watchful eye of Musk’s good friend Greg Abbott, are more likely to rule in Tesla’s favor. [read post]
The anonymity of Soldier F was also debated, but after hearing from a former RUC assistant Cheif Constable Alan McQuillan about the possible threat to Soldier F, Justice Fowler, the presiding judge, determined it should be maintained for now. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals will determine whether changes in the political landscape allow it to overrule Supreme Court precedent regarding limits on coordinated party spending in federal elections after oral arguments in the case. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Maddy Carter
Judge Daniel D. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Whatever Joe Biden, the father, is feeling about the legal proceedings brought against his son, unlike Donald Trump, who has bitterly attacked the prosecutors and judges involved in the various cases against him, Biden has said nothing about U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Will Yeatman
Biden, Judge VanDyke has made a series of alarming contentions about how politics, and not the law, is shaping outcomes in immigration cases at the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:05 am by Mykola Stetsenko
Among these cases are high-profile prosecutions involving oligarchs and top officials, including former Cabinet ministers, judges, and even the Head of the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:08 am by Andrew Koppelman
(And in case it matters, his dissertation supervisor, Noah Feldman, is a Jew.) [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Felipe Navarro
Amid the diverse topics covered, the judges, particularly Judge Pérez Manrique from Uruguay, exhibited interest in this area. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 4:53 am by jonathanturley
That may not seem like a lot but it could prove determinative for a judge on a marginal call over the need for incarceration. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Alexandre Skander Galand
To overcome a deferral, the Prosecutor must apply to the Pre-Trial Chamber (PTC), which will come close, as Kevin Jon Heller notes, to judging “the overall functioning of a State’s legal system. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 3:05 pm by The Law Blogger
Remanding the case to the lower court to determine which of the charged acts are private and which are public was very much on the minds of the collective justices. [read post]