Search for: "Price v State of New York" Results 21 - 40 of 2,698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 7:00 am by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
New York, in which the state of New York, in the depths if the Great Depression, made it illegal to sell milk for low prices. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 8:40 am by becassidy
C|M|LAW’s own Professor Chris Sagers’ new book United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 8:31 am by Cinthia Macie
  The New York Bill would give New York enforcers a new weapon to challenge transactions by dominant firms under state law in state courts. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:55 am by randal shaheen
In March 2010, the New York AG’s office filed a lawsuit against Tempur-Pedic,the well-known mattress manufacturer, accusing it of violating New York state law by enforcing minimum retail prices for its products. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:01 am by Ronald Mann
This case involves a suit by a group of New York merchants, arguing that the New York statute violates the First Amendment because it regulates what they say about their prices. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 11:08 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
In the waning days of 2022, New York Governor Kathy Hochul vetoed the New York State Freelance Isn’t Free Act bill (S 8369B) that had been awaiting her action for over six months. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 2:29 pm by Jeremy Saland
The Martin Act, New York General Business Law 352 and related subsections, is the hammer in a prosecutor’s toolbox to investigate and prosecute securities fraud in New York State. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by John Jascob
He was concerned about the pricing associated with a new MetLife joint life insurance offering, known as GSUL. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:50 pm
The stated intent of the Price-Anderson Act was to foster commercial development of nuclear power. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:49 am by Ronald Mann
Representing the merchants, Deepak Gupta insisted that the statute prevents merchants from posting separate cash and credit prices and that the state of New York has no justifiable reason to do so. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This might not meet the standard, but a trial court in New York, in Crocker C. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:06 am by msW1Ld
  California now joins Illinois, New York and Michigan (see March 31, 2008 Post) in treating resale price maintenance as a per se offense in violation of its state antitrust law even though such conduct is subject to rule of reason review under section 1 of the Sherman Act after Leegin Creative Lether Prods., Inc. v. [read post]