Search for: "Price v. Age, Ltd."
Results 21 - 40
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm
United States Travis Price, a South Carolina man whose charges were dropped after police body camera footage showed he did not fight an officer who attacked him is suing the city of Rock Hill and U.S Rep. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
Norges Bank also announced its decision to place Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd under observation due to an unacceptable risk that the company is contributing to or is itself responsible for gross corruption. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm
Single, he is survived by two adult over the age of 25. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
According to the referring court, Ferrari had used those trade marks to identify replacement and accessory parts of high-priced luxury sports cars previously sold under those trade marks. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
As already mentioned, on 26 and 27 November 2020 Mann J heard another CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
In the Courts Australia Aaren Pty Ltd trading as Price Beat Travel v Arya [2020] NSWDC 657 – the defendant was dissatisfied with the services she received from the plaintiff’s travel agency when flying to India. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 11:08 am
In Bolger v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:59 pm
MacElree v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:42 am
The Delhi High Court passed an order in Novartis Ag & Anr v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
The Rhode Island Noncompetition Agreement Act, which became effective on January 15, 2020, prohibits non-competes without regard to geographic location and duration for the following types of employees: (1) non-exempt employees under the FLSA; (2) undergraduate or graduate students participating in an internship or short-term employment; (3) employees aged 18 or younger; and (4) low-wage workers (defined as earning 250% or less of the federal poverty level ($31,225 per year under current… [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Parliament has determined that such an order should expire when the young person reaches the age of 18. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 08877-19 Lynch v Metro.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 04718-19 Williamson v Sunday Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 3 Harassment (2018), 9 Reporting of crime (2018), 12 Discrimination (2018), 16 Payments to criminals (2018), Resolved – IPSO mediation Last Week in the Courts On 20 January 2020 judgment was handed down on behalf of Warby J in the case of… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
Referring to Arnold J (as he then was) in Sky Plc v Skykick UK Ltd in the High Court (the available relevant law at the time of application), even though there was no express requirement for intention to use a trade mark when registering it, such an application could constitute bad faith. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
On the same day Richard Spearman QC handed down judgment in the case of Yavuz v Tesco Stores Ltd & anr [2019] EWHC 1971 (QB)(heard 15, 16 and 17 July 2019). [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
In Verition Partners Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic took a look at the recent confirmation from the Swedish Supreme Court that the storage of infringing goods with a view to sell them might trigger both civil and criminal liability in a recent case.InternKat Antonella Gentile looked into the decision of the General Court of the European Union (GC) in its judgment in KID-Systeme v EUIPO - Sky (SKYFi) T-354/18 that gave the GC the opportunity to analyse the opposition… [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:21 pm
" Fitness Entm't Ltd v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 11:30 pm
There are no pictures on the wall, lest we lose our deposit, no investment in the flat as a home, it is merely a “Dwelling House’, a legal concept described perfectly by Lord Millett in the case of Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. [read post]
