Search for: "Price v. Cross"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 6:08 am
Earlier this month I wrote about crossing the line - the "premises line. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 9:08 am
The Supreme Court of Canada will release its decision in The Queen v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Price II, Judge.Representing Appellant Cross: Donna D. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
The plaintiff alleged that she later learned that the condominium units had been “flipped” by the defendant and his business partner to sell to the plaintiff at a price over and above the market price. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:49 am
Eidelman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
[Cross-posted at electionlawblog.com]On this tenth anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Again, sophisticated lenders would take the adopted rules into account when they priced their loans. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:18 am
The December 2 decision is Jacobs v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:12 pm
The appellate hearing in the "Posner" Apple v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:38 am
(David v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:30 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:03 pm
In Calhoun County v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:41 am
O’Neil Category: Product #: Regular price:$ (Sale ends !) [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:11 pm
Noonan -- Sandoz successfully (at least for now) has overcome conventional wisdom, the plain language of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) (or, at least those provisions regarding patent litigation) and Amgen in obtaining approval for its figastrim biosimilar product, Zarxio™ in Amgen v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 1:30 pm
Part IV analyses various licensing practices that may allegedly amount to abuses of a dominant position with a specific focus on price discrimination and what EC law refers to as "excessive" pricing. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am
Court determinations of FRAND royalty rates for individual licensors—also as percentages of unsubsidized wholesale handset prices—in a few different cases have been based upon or cross-checked using such aggregate figures:6% to 10% for LTE by Judge Selna in TCL v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:42 pm
(Cross-posted on SportsJudge Blog) [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:06 am
This is the final part of this Kat’s analysis on Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat). [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:53 am
On the ball as always, Joost told me that the appeal in Neurim Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
