Search for: "Price v. District of Columbia"
Results 21 - 40
of 495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
On April 12, 2012, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Price v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
Columbia Casualty Comp., Docket No. 21-2695) [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:20 am
Columbia Casualty Co., 2011 WL 5313818 (7th Cir. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:51 am
On May 24, 2012, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Onyeoziri v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
§922(g)(1), (1) what does the phrase “law-abiding, responsible citizens” in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 4:09 pm
Relying on Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
Dealers Assoc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:56 pm
The court’s decision in Price v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Columbia Cas. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm
UgandaHuman Rights Network Uganda v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 10:01 pm
District of Columbia, No. 2006 Civ. 1593 (Fed. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am
In Hadir v Vazquez, 2019 WL 5061068 (District of Columbia, 2019) the district court granted the Petition of Sami Abou-Haidar, who resided in Paris, France, for the return of the party’s daughter to France. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:46 am
ISDA and SIFMA v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:01 pm
District of Columbia 20-331Issues: (1) Whether a writ of mandamus is appropriate because, contrary to the holding of the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
(…) Thirty States and the District of Columbia filed an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs, and they argue that C should be able to sue A in that hypothetical. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
Price v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:48 am
District of Columbia contract law imposes no obligation on a party to a contract to engage in an act of charity by waiving a condition precedent to enable an option holder to obtain its wishes. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia refused to alter a judgment vacating a labor rule for lack of a jurisdictional quorum, and two more district courts decided cases on the contraceptive rule – one each way. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:27 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia refused to alter a judgment vacating a labor rule for lack of a jurisdictional quorum, and two more district courts decided cases on the contraceptive rule – one each way. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
District Court was faced with the same problem in 1964 in District of Columbia v. [read post]
