Search for: "Price v. Planning Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
In Dixon v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
Katz and Sabastian V. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 10:29 am
In The Williams Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 12:56 pm
See also LongPath Capital, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:10 pm
By retaining a backup plan, the board failed to give the special committee sufficient autonomy and authority. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:00 am
In Securities Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:00 am
In Van Gorkom the board was held to have breached its fiduciary disclosure duty in failing to advise the shareholders of how they’d arrived at the $55 per share merger price. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
In Gentile v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
In Intelligent Digital Systems, LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:41 am
The Agency planned to analyze cost proposals for both cost and price reasonableness. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:28 pm
Retirement Board of Allegheny County v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:44 pm
Lee, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm
We just completed a two-part series on the Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Statute, commonly known as the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA).[1] We will return to TINA in a few months to address the Defense Contract Audit Agency’s (DCAA) playbook for defective pricing audits. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:45 pm
James V. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 5:15 am
The courts often cite Guth v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 8:20 am
" The most alarming part of the article is the observation that there is a "disconnect" between this accounting change and the Treasury Plan for banks. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:02 am
Board of Directors, 2023 WL 1830446 (10th Cir. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 12:00 pm
As the opinion noted: The Staples stockholder-approved option plans, by contrast, gave no discretion to the compensation committee in setting exercise prices--the grant date controlled in all cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 11:05 am
Since many share repurchases are executed over time[v], company boards should be able to demonstrate intended impact with resulting price and valuation multiples as well as discussion over whether repurchase should continue; i.e. whether the repurchase program is having the desired effect. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
In Princeton Ophthalmic, LLC v. [read post]
