Search for: "Price v. R & A Sales" Results 21 - 40 of 2,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
C. 5713.03), as amended in 2012 as part of Ohio House Bill 487.R. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:03 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
The Alberta and British Columbia Securities Commissions recently released a joint notice requesting comments on proposed amendments to the TSX Venture Exchange Rule Book that would allow the TSX-V to provide an automated market-on-close facility and a special trading session at the end of the day to enable traded and the submission of crosses at the last sale price. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 8:14 pm by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
The fact that the sale in Starways Trading v Pearl Island Trading was said to be ‘ex-warehouse’ was not a provision to the contrary. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:55 pm by Alan Friel
Co-authored by: Heather Bloink Dynamic pricing is the practice of offering different prices to consumers based on various factors designed to maximize sales and profits, which may include the retailer’s perception of the willingness of a particular consumer to pay at a given price point, often in connection with other factors such as a given point in time. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
The sales tax regime was designed to tax individuals on the price of goods acquired for personal consumption. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
C. 5713.03), as amended in 2012 as part of Ohio House Bill 487.R. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:51 am by Renae Lloyd
    The post American Finance Trust – Secondary Sales Price $15.65/Share appeared first on White Securities Law. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:53 pm by Allison Tussey
Barnes admitted that, in many cases, he had already negotiated the resale at the higher price while he was simultaneously negotiating the short sale of the property at the lower price. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:11 am by Woodrow Pollack
As to price erosion, a competitor whose sales would represent less than .2% of the Plaintiffs projected sales for this year is not a significant threat to the Plaintiffs' price point. [read post]