Search for: "Price v. State Highway Department"
Results 21 - 40
of 105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
Update | Thomas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
State Highway Department, 167 S.C. 217). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
State Highway Department, 167 S.C. 217). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
State Highway Department, 167 S.C. 217). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
State Highway Department, 167 S.C. 217). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm
State Highway Department, 167 S.C. 217). [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
IN THE NEWS The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:08 pm
Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said that the rule would decrease the United States’ vulnerability to “global shifts in the price of oil” and “reduce carbon emissions by 2.5 billion metric tons. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am
Paul discussed the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am
People of a certain age will recall that, to reduce billboard clutter along America’s highways, Congress gave the Federal Highway Administration authority to withhold funds from states that would not enter into “federal-state agreements” giving the federal government authority to regulate billboards within their jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
On Mr B's aplication for a stay until determination of his planning appeal, this did not stand a realistic prospect of success Against the argued precedents of South Buckinghamshire District Council v Smith [2006] EWHC 281 QB, South Cambridgeshire DC v Price [2008] EWHC 1234 (Admin) and Brentwood Borough Council v Ball [2009] EWHC 2433 (QB), where injunctions had been refused pending planning appeals, there was the fact that these all concerned injunction… [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 6:37 am
State, Dept. of Transportation v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
" This court would hold Bidder B's feet to the fire.On the other hand, in MJ Paquet Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm
Supreme Court in (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:40 am
GM’s offerings include the Tahoe Police Pursuit Vehicle, rated for 16 m.p.g. city and 23 m.p.g. highway, and the Caprice Police Pursuit Vehicle, rated for 18 m.p.g. city and 26 m.p.g. highway with a V-6 engine, less than that for the V-8). [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
When the M/V Galani hit the M/V Marina in the Paros-Antiparos Strait, a woman named Curtis with wounds most injurious brought suit in the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 7:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
The Federal Highway Administration approved the nation’s first traffic congestion pricing program. [read post]
