Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2022, 10:12 am
In Tolliver Group, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 12:33 am
Dukes, the United States Supreme Court rejected class certification in... [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 12:33 am
Dukes, the United States Supreme Court rejected class certification in... [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
United States</i> and <i>Nance v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that the United States Department of the Interior violated the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (“RRA”) by imposing price threshold conditions that require federal lessees to pay royalties when commodity prices rise. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:20 pm
United States, Fed. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:33 am
Lochner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
The COVID-19 pandemic created a run on certain personal hygiene products due to the fear of a widespread outbreak in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
On July 25, 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued the much-anticipated ruling on class certification in Erica P. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:36 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:14 am
The potential difficulty inherent in collecting damages from a foreign defendant with limited assets in the United States supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that the United States Department of the Interior violated the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (“RRA”) by imposing price threshold conditions that require federal lessees to pay royalties when commodity prices rise. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 5:30 am
We will be following the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm
On September 29, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the matter of Expressions Hair Design et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:15 am
This focus is particularly alarming for international companies with subsidiaries in Brazil because Brazil’s IP royalty remittance laws directly conflict with the United State’s transfer pricing policies. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:15 pm
The prosecutor relies on United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
rejected Plaintiffs' argument that an antitrust stalwart, United States v. [read post]
