Search for: "Price v. United States Government et al" Results 21 - 40 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 8:24 am by Andy Dorchak
 United States consumers were harmed economically, in that the higher prices charged were part of $300 million in retail sales from the five publishers, including $40 million for e-books licensed through Apple’s iBookstore. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Matthias Weller
On 10 July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rendered its judgment in the matter of Alan Philipps et al. v. the Federal Republic of Germany and the Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz. [read post]
11 May 2010, 2:59 am
Last week, in the wake of the State Supreme Court's ruling in Brayton et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:29 pm by David Hart QC
Charity Commission et al, Court of Appeal, 20 March 2012, read judgment Tangled web, this one, but an important one. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 2:09 pm by Eric Caligiuri
AMGEN INC. et al., the United States Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion ruled that biosimilar makers can give their required 180-day statutory notice of sales before their products win approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 2:09 pm by Eric Caligiuri
AMGEN INC. et al., the United States Supreme Court in a unanimous opinion ruled that biosimilar makers can give their required 180-day statutory notice of sales before their products win approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). [read post]