Search for: "Price v. Watts"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2013, 7:26 pm
He noted his advocacy for the side of innovators and wanting to protect people from de-incentivizing innovators in the course of negotiating to the lowest price. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236 Thawley J dismissed two libel claims concerning a Golden Girls parody puppet show. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:55 pm
In the recent decision Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
The website, Exaro, and its editor in chief Mark Watts have come in for particular criticism over the affair. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
Both federal and provincial governments in Canada have been introducing unprecedented new legislation and orders relating to key aspects of competition and advertising law, including price-fixing, price gouging, advertising of COVID-19 related products and services and performance claims (e.g., in relation to vaccines, testing, medical products and other therapies). [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
The ongoing trial of Christopher Aitken, Martin Hockridge, Djazia Chaib-Eddour, Alexander Peat, and Gary Purnell, who deny using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause harassment, alarm or distress against BBC journalist Nicholas Watt during an anti-lockdown protest is covered by the Press Gazette here and here. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm
BOX 81 BISMARCK MO-Missouri 18 Blue Springs Price Chopper 1100 South 7 Highway Blue Springs MO-Missouri 19 Price Chopper 1305 North 7 Hwy. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 6:50 am
Among other things, she referred to the Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 8:45 am
David Price Part I http://t.co/GGQKOQCSg4 -> A Conversation with Dr. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
The case, known as Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
Inasmuch as almost every country would like to be free of dependence on oil and coal -- because of their direct costs, foreign policy implications, and environmental and health impact -- solar cells (like wind turbines) would be attractive to almost every human being, especially if they were produced at an affordable price. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
Inasmuch as almost every country would like to be free of dependence on oil and coal -- because of their direct costs, foreign policy implications, and environmental and health impact -- solar cells (like wind turbines) would be attractive to almost every human being, especially if they were produced at an affordable price. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
There is also an increased risk in a downturn that counterparties will default, or seek to escape performance, as transaction costs rise with the increased price of services and materials, and the scarcity of credit. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
Claire’s Boutiques, 949 F.2d 1482 (7th Cir. 1991), the court found that a small, 5-watt receiver (list price $130, or $231.71 in 2013 dollars), wired to two small ceiling-mounted speakers 5 to 35 feet away, was a “home-type” sytem. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
Claire’s Boutiques, 949 F.2d 1482 (7th Cir. 1991), the court found that a small, 5-watt receiver (list price $130, or $231.71 in 2013 dollars), wired to two small ceiling-mounted speakers 5 to 35 feet away, was a “home-type” sytem. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm
Claire’s Boutiques, 949 F.2d 1482 (7th Cir. 1991), the court found that a small, 5-watt receiver (list price $130, or $231.71 in 2013 dollars), wired to two small ceiling-mounted speakers 5 to 35 feet away, was a “home-type” sytem. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
State Department spokesperson Ned Price said yesterday. [read post]
