Search for: "Prince v. Lowe"
Results 21 - 40
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2015, 7:35 am
" Justice Perell endorsed the recent decision in Charlton v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
The low number of statements in open court in 2011 is another indication of the declining numbers of libel cases before the English courts. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:58 pm
From today’s Dejoria v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
Cariou v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
If I say that you are Prince it does make you Prince. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
On the contrary, as aptly set out in the UK case of Sawkins v Hyperion [2005] EWCA Civ 565 (a country that traditionally envisaged originality as a low threshold and as requiring just skill, labour or effort):A work may be complete rubbish and utterly worthless, but copyright protection may be available for it, just as it is for the great masterpieces of imaginative literature, art and music. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
The Supreme Court, in particular, has rejected such claims in at least nine cases, from Prince v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:37 am
In Prince of Peace Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 10:10 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 4:45 am
It all depends on how you understand "evocation" | IP Education Series #6Never Too Late 256 [Week ending March 8] Meghan Markle and Prince Harry to abandon “Sussex Royal” UK trade mark applications | EU General Court reiterates that low distinctiveness cannot be offset by specialised public in Balmain cases | [Guest Post] CREATe/BIICL conference report: Mapping Platform Regulation in the UK | [Guest Post] CREATe/BIICL conference… [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:53 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court declined to hear Lenz. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
The court then expressed “skeptic[ism]” about the approach of Prince v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:03 am
A: Prince is an example: Prince would never license covers. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign states, kings… [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:05 am
Prince: Revenue comes from being recommended on related videos, etc. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:02 pm
Even in Cariou v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:24 pm
See, e.g., NFIB v. [read post]
