Search for: "Prior v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 21 - 40
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Valencia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
No findings of fact or decision of the Commissioner of Social Security shall be reviewed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
In addition to prior positions with the SEC, including as counsel to former SEC Commissioner Robert J. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Crown Estate Commissioners v Peabody Trust & Poplak [2011] EWHC 1467 (Ch) [link to PDF]As we noted a while ago, the transfer of the Crown Estates Commissioners social housing estates to the Peabody Trust had brought about a test case on the status of those tenants who had been regulated tenants (protected or statutory) under Rent Act 1977. [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am
Totel Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC was heard on 25-26 Apr 2018. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:33 pm
., v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission on June 16, 2022. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, which the Supreme Court decided in April. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:40 am
It is important to note that there was no determination by the Tribunal that the wealth transfer in Parkland was socially adverse. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Prohibiting a person from taking “any action to make . . . any public statement that the complaint is without factual basis” is a plain prior restraint on speech.[22] Prohibiting that same person from “permit[ting] to be made any public statement that the complaint is without factual basis” only exacerbates the problem by imposing on the defendant an obligation to restrain speech by others. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
Of course, the Model Law also protects personal information defined to include a consumer’s identifying information in combination with one or more of the following: (i) Social Security number, (ii) driver’s license number or non-driver identification card number, (iii) account number, credit or debit card number, (iv) any security code, access code or password that would permit access to a consumer’s financial account, or (v) biometric records. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner applied for a hearing and redetermination of his retirement benefits (see Retirement and Social Security Law §§ 74 [d]; 374 [d]). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Petitioner applied for a hearing and redetermination of his retirement benefits (see Retirement and Social Security Law §§ 74 [d]; 374 [d]). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:20 am
") AC33049 - Commissioner of Social Services v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
While the previous OS iPad version remains available at the Apple App Store exit disclaimer icon (search under “HHS SRA Tool”), HIPAA Entities that presently use or plan to use the OS iPad tool should consider comparing the prior tool against the updated Windows SRA Tool to verify the continued suitability of its continued use and any adjustments in understanding or application that might be warranted by these differences. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:51 am
The IRS could have done a computer search through the DMV, contacted Terrell's employer, searched using Terrell’s social security number, or undertaken any number of actions that might have located the Dallas address. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
(Posted Conference Paper: "The Problem of Labor and the Construction of Socialism in Cuba"). [read post]
