Search for: "Pritchard v. Smith" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2011, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 14 January 2011, the Master of the Rolls, Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ heard the appeals of the claimant in the privacy anonymity cases of JIH v News Group (No.1) ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) and (No. 2) ([2010] EWHC 2979 (QB)). [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 12:25 am by INFORRM
In the Courts On 13th December, Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down Judgment in Smith v ADVFN plc (No.7) [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Cambridge v Makin, heard 8 to 12 November 2010 (Tugendhat J) Pritchard Englefield & anr v Steinberg heard 19 November 2010 (Eady J) Wallis & anr v Meredith heard 29 November and 1 December 2010 (Christopher Clarke J) Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors heard 3 December 2010 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 3 December 2010 an application in the case of Smith v ADVN (No.9) will be heard by Mr Justice Tugendhat Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJ [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:47 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Pritchard Joyce & Hinds (A Firm) v Batcup & Anor [2009] EWCA Civ 369 (05 May 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Rahme v Smith & Williamson Trust Corporation Ltd [2009] EWHC 911 (Ch) (30 April 2009) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Raggett v The Society of Jesus Trust 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes [...] [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
AI Index: AMR 51/087/2007 When a capital defendant seeks to circumvent procedures necessary to ensure the propriety of his conviction and sentence, he does not ask the State to permit him to take his own life. [read post]