Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent" Results 21 - 40 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a proposed rule that would implement a section of the Affordable Care Act that prohibits discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:11 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
The hospital responded by providing two occurrence reports directly related to the patient’s care. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
  Police responded by taking pictures for their families. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:31 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Doctors facing vague abortion legal exceptions are reticent to provide some critical services. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Roger Parloff
Article III, section 2, clause 3 provides, for instance: “The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Dulgheriu (and another) (Appellants) v London Borough of Ealing (Respondent) [2019] EWCA Civ 1490, On appeal from: [2018] EWHC 1667 (Admin). [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In doing so, the Court rejected the notion that the newspaper could always distance itself from anything a political candidate said in the space provided him, by merely writing its own editorials responding to the candidate’s speech. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The full text of the Appellate Division's decision is set out below:  Arrigo v DiNapoli 2022 NY Slip Op 02845 Decided on April 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The full text of the Appellate Division's decision is set out below:  Arrigo v DiNapoli 2022 NY Slip Op 02845 Decided on April 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
In this case the court will consider to what extent, if at all, are factual findings made by the General Court of the European Union in the course of its judgment in Case T-691/14 Servier SAS v EU Commission annulling a competition infringement decision of the European Commission binding as res judicata on English courts in a follow-on private damages action brought by the Respondents against the Appellants. [read post]