Search for: "Prudential v. Department of Ins." Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 6:55 am by Mehmet Munur
Not finding any case that invalidated a contract based on electronic signatures, the court turned to State of New York Insurance Department opinions. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm by Will Baude
S., at 305, it may at any time replace such judicial rules with legislation of its own, see Prudential Ins. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:32 am by Will Baude
  In my view the only thing making this difficult is the Supreme Court's (apparent) earlier conclusion that it had jurisdiction in INS v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm by Franklin C. McRoberts
Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss should have been denied”]; Brandenberg v Primus Assoc., 304 AD2d 694 [2d Dept 2003] [“Supreme Court . . . properly denied that branch of the appellants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint . . . as barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel where the prior action was dismissed without prejudice and the issue of legal sufficiency of the complaint was not ‘necessarily decided’”… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by LindaMBeale
  As I had indicated in the BNA Webinar on the two cases prior to the decision, the US retained a sufficient stake in the matter--relying on INS v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
He summarized Prudential's non-qualified program, which utilizes a Barbados-based off-shore partner, and highlighted the programs' regulatory and legal protections. [read post]