Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2024, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court's 2020 decision in McGirt v. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 1:23 pm
The City’s law department and an outside law firm jointly represented all three defendants. [read post]
15 Oct 2024, 10:49 am
From People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 2:05 pm
Town of Southold, New York, two brothers ask the justices to consider “whether the Takings Clause” – and, in particular, the requirement that the property be taken “for public use” – “is violated when a property is taken for a public amenity as a pretext for defeating an owner’s plans for another use. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 1:58 pm
Among the other cases in which the justices denied review were: X Corp. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 3:00 am
Yet they were actually from a Justice Department filing 184 years ago, just days from the 1840 presidential election. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 12:06 pm
Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 10:56 am
Note-1: Ex-Department of Justice official Jeff Clark, who was formerly CC4, was dropped in the superseding indictment as a co-conspirator following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Trump v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 10:06 am
Department of Justice separately moved to vacate the stay.[17] The Department of Justice argued that the plaintiffs did not prove they had standing, request the stay, or show they would be likely to succeed on the merits or would suffer irreparable harm.[18] The Department of Justice further argued that the PIP process was legal because “Congress vested discretionary unreviewable parole authority in the Secretary, the Secretary established… [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:04 am
In his majority opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 8:50 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 7:52 am
” 1) Broad Vision 1 (Court detractors): Interpreting Trump v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 5:59 am
According to a report compiled by an advocacy group, Pregnancy Justice, in the year after Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Since the fall of Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 1:55 am
And the Justice Department appears focused on less controversial conduct. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 5:02 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
The Justice Department’s released survey found that, under the Biden administration, there has been a significant increase in crime. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 12:59 am
In answer to a written question from Julia Buckley (Shrewsbury, Lab) to the Secretary of State for Justice asking “when her Department plans to publish a response to the Law Commission report entitled Celebrating Marriage: A New Weddings Law, published in July 2022”, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Alex Davies-Jones, said this: “We are aware that the Law Commission made recommendations for wholesale change of weddings law in July 2022. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 3:51 pm
I would wager that Justice Story, author of Prigg v. [read post]
