Search for: "Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. EPA"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
The case is Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, et. al., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
For the alleged Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) violation for failure to immediately notify the National Response Center of the chlorine release, Norfolk Southern will pay a penalty of $32,500, to be deposited in the Hazardous Substance Superfund. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The company also failed to implement spill response plans, document spills and properly train employees for handling the material. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, December 23, 2009 Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for reimbursement of past response costs concerning the East 23rd Battery Site located in Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida for publication. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
According to the EPA, based on information received from the San Bernardino Certified Unified Program Agency, the California Emergency Management Agency and the National Response Center, the GATX Corporation delayed reporting the release of 250 pounds of ammonia from a rail car repair facility on Sept. 9, 2008, which was caused when an employee failed to follow company procedures for flaring ammonia from a tank car. . [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
EPA, brought pursuant to the employee protection provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA); the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA); the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA); the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA); the Federal Water Pollution Prevention and Control Act (FWPPCA); and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA). [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 2:12 pm
In a Texas oil spill case, US v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
(Energy Progress) due to the unacceptable risk of these companies being responsible for severe environmental damage. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
EPA noted that these updates fulfill its responsibility under the Clean Air Act to review emissions standards. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) erred in exempting a majority of farms from air pollution reporting requirements. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
Each agency must appoint a senior sustainability officer responsible for complying with the order. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $132,000 penalty was ordered after inspectors found problems with the way Spirit transported waste, the way the company stored and disposed of hazardous waste and failing to provide documented hazardous waste training for employees. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Chief Justice Strine dissented, excoriating Duke for its "business strategy … to run the company in a manner that purposely skirted, and in many ways consciously violated, important environmental laws" (City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
” Kohn and Sanjour battled the EPA for four years, and on May 30, 1995, in a case that impacted every government employee, the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, in William Sanjour et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Book Chapters: Rishi Batra, Integrative v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:13 am
Environmental Law; Riverkeeper v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm
NMA further contends EPA, in violation of administrative law requirements, has either not consulted with other agencies responsible for ensuring electricity reliability or, if it has done so, has not subjected those consultations to public scrutiny. [read post]
