Search for: "Public Service Company v. Brown" Results 21 - 40 of 802
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
Brown Engstrand * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Cases 444 (2023) [see § 61.03 n.1.2], delivery drivers were found to be employees on the basis that their service was publicly advertised to diners through its website and app. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 December 2023, there was a hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Davidoff and others v Brown QB-2020-002760. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
It includes provisions for digital verification services and the flow of personal data for law enforcement and national security purposes. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:54 pm by Jason Kelley
Along with the ACLU, we challenged the law and won core protections for internet rights in a Supreme Court case, Reno v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
My co-panelist Clare Morell of the Ethics and Public Policy Center put together an excellent tweet thread summarizing some of her thoughts, including on the anonymous-speech angle. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Act 689 is Not Narrowly Tailored The Court first considers the Supreme Court's narrow-tailoring analysis in Brown v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
For example, the draft Merger Guidelines anticipate that a company can use acquisitions to strengthen its overall position across multiple products or services and thereby frustrate competition from companies who do not offer a similar array of products or services.[5] Such a theory could apply to any large company that is expanding into a new product area through acquisition. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
SB 261 would embrace a considerably larger universe than the proposed SEC rules because it would cover all large companies, not just the public reporting ones under the SEC’s jurisdiction.[16] Most U.S. [read post]