Search for: "Public Utility Workers v. Public Service Co."
Results 21 - 40
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2021, 12:48 pm
Islam v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 4:59 am
Public Health Service ended mercury's use by hat manufacturers in 26 states through mutual agreements. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
” Co-operation of Labor, Leland Stanford (May 4, 1887) at 2. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 10:07 am
The case is entitled Talarico v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:27 pm
Supp. 2d 288, 302 (D.N.H. 2008) (holding that the CDA did not preempt plaintiff's right of publicity claim); Atlantic Recording Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm
Thus, there was a limit on the time within which MA Plans had to determine how to utilize this new flexibility. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
,supra, 585 F.Supp. at pp. 450-452; accord Whitaker House Co-op, supra, 366 U.S.28), or when a bakery hires cake decorators to work on a regular basis on itscustom-designed cakes (cf., e.g,, Dole v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 11:28 am
Stakeholders v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:49 pm
., co-author of CCH Franchise Regulation and Damages.The recent case of Echo, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
” Local 246 Utility Workers Union of America v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
In determining whether the presumption should be applied, he found that the public utility presumption has been applied only to traditional public utilities such as electricity, natural gas, telephone, and cable television services, where the employers provide an essential service directly to the public and are the only providers of that service. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
The second part of this year yielded several cases addressing instances of workplace violence, including one case involving a third-party attack and another an assault by a co-worker. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 10:35 am
KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Smith (Marva) v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:40 pm
” Stakeholders v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm
Both Mulally and Korenchuk made disparaging remarks regarding Staub’s Reserve service, and Mulally indicated to a co-worker that she wanted to “get rid of” Staub. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:29 pm
Conservation Comm'n v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Prodigy Services Co., in which a New York court held that by monitoring and filtering third-party content, websites could become liable for the content they didn’t block. [read post]
