Search for: "QUI DOE"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,396
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2019, 5:55 am
Continue reading The post Qui Tam Actions Under the California False Claims Act appeared first on Healthcare Fraud Lawyer Blog. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:19 am
Accordingly, the court does not agree that the statute can reasonably be characterized as invoking the executive's core function of criminal prosecution. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:28 pm
§ 292(b), the "false marking" portion of the patent statute that makes it a violation to intentionally mark an item in commerce with a patent number that has expired or does not protect the... [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:56 pm
Off-label promotion is unlawful, but does not amount to an FCA violation. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
What is a qui tam lawsuit? [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 7:03 pm
When a relator does bring an action under the FCA, the complaint is first filed under seal and served upon the government. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:17 pm
Most people may be familiar with the term “whistleblower” but how does it relate to qui tam law? [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
Attorney’s Office does not use the discovery process to build a criminal health care fraud case. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 2:20 pm
Leveski thus recognized the important roles played both by qui tam whistleblowers and by the qui tam lawyers. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:20 pm
It is a crime against all taxpayers when the government is mislead and does not award contracts to the companies with the best prices and products. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:21 pm
Redish acknowledges that qui tam actions seem to put government power in the hands of private litigants, and he explains at length why the qui tam analogy does not justify using private contingent fee lawyers to pursue public claims. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:15 pm
In a recent interview with Corporate Crime Reporter, qui tam attorney Joseph E.B. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
’ Indeed it does not refer to ‘certification’ at all. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Ohio Feb. 23, 2011) and concluded that the qui tam provisions of the false marking statute violate the Take Care clause of the U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
Defenders of Wildlife—qui tam statutes effectively assign part of the government’s claim to qui tam informers. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 3:10 pm
Standing to sue on behalf of the government does not convert the claim into a personal one, says the court, and absent statutory authority to proceed pro se on the government’s behalf, a relator may not do so. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:06 am
[Qui Bono? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Why does the court tell us about the strange and messy background of Piacentile? [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 2:40 pm
If the government does not decide to step in, the relator can continue independently. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:32 pm
He apparently does not think this violates any Rules of Professional Conduct. [read post]
