Search for: "Qazi v. Qazi"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 8:11 am
See Saunders v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:11 am
See Saunders v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 2:08 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
Andrew Arden has been involved in many leading cases including the landmark human rights cases, Harrow LBC v Qazi, Kay v Lambeth LBC and YL v Birmingham CC and is considered to be at the forefront of the development of housing law.Jan Luba QC, of Garden Court Chambers, will be rounding off the day by offering his perspective on the problems and challenges that housing lawyers will confront in 2012. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
Andrew Arden has been involved in many leading cases including the landmark human rights cases, Harrow LBC v Qazi, Kay v Lambeth LBC and YL v Birmingham CC and is considered to be at the forefront of the development of housing law.Jan Luba QC, of Garden Court Chambers, will be rounding off the day by offering his perspective on the problems and challenges that housing lawyers will confront in 2012. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
The Dubious Data of Wisconsin v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:48 am
the decisions in Qazi, Kay and Doherty. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:48 am
We know from the various Article 8 cases (Qazi [at 54], Powell [at 35] and Thurrock v West [at 25]) that local authorities are considered to know their own communities best and are better equipped than courts to make decisions about the use of their housing stock. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
“Home” is an autonomous concept which does not require a right of occupation in domestic law; it is a question of fact whether someone has sufficient and continuous links with a property to be occupying it as a home: see Buckley v UK (1996) 23 EHRR 101; Qazi v Harrow LBC [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 AC 983; [2003] HLR 75. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
In Qazi, Connors, Kay and McCann situations, a Local Authority has discretion as to whe [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 1:19 pm
In the case of Salt Miners v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
After hearing but before judgment, Doran v Liverpool was handed down by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Supreme Court case Pierce v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
In a recent Supreme Court judgment, Salamat Mansha Mashih v The State, Justice Qazi Faez Isa expressed dismay over the urge to accuse others, and claimed that every second person pointed a finger and accused others of disparaging religion without recognizing and acknowledging that this was not a straightforward or common offence, but instead bears the death penalty. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
Zehentner v Austria, a judgment of the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights, demonstrates yet again that the ECHR has a different approach to mandatory rights to possession than the House of Lords has expressed in the trilogy of cases (Buckley, Connors, McCann and Cosic against Qazi, Kay, Doherty). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
See further, Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 A.C. 983; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 792; [2003] H.L.R. 75, per Lord Bingham [22] and Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 A.C. 367, [2008] H.L.R. 45, in the written submissions for Birmingham (noted at 391F-G, 392E-F and per Lord Hope at 401E. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
See further, Harrow London Borough Council v Qazi [2003] UKHL 43; [2004] 1 A.C. 983; [2003] 3 W.L.R. 792; [2003] H.L.R. 75, per Lord Bingham [22] and Birmingham CC v Doherty [2008] UKHL 57, [2009] 1 A.C. 367, [2008] H.L.R. 45, in the written submissions for Birmingham (noted at 391F-G, 392E-F and per Lord Hope at 401E. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 3:43 am
Voyias v Information Commissioner and the London Borough of Camden EA/2011/0007 – Read Judgment The First Tier Tribunal has overturned a decision of the Information Commissioner and ordered Camden Council to provide information about empty properties in the borough to a former member of the Advisory Service for Squatters. [read post]
