Search for: "Quick v. Kelly" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2007, 5:35 am
Let's say that hypothetically you disagree with the Supreme Court's recent holding in Ledbetter v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 6:44 am
Let's say that hypothetically you disagree with the Supreme Court's recent holding in Ledbetter v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:19 am by Eric
* Kevin Kelly: "This is the great gift of the free web. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:20 am
As the majority opinion in Hinckley illustrates, courts are far too quick to rely on the USSC's holding in Smith v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:56 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Maisel encourages a brief phone call or quick email to obtain informal feedback. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
As always, the IPKat is here to bring you a quick summary -- the 174th edition of Never Too Late.Merry Christmas! [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
As always, the IPKat is here to bring you a quick summary -- the 171st edition of Never Too Late. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 2:33 am
Ingrid Kelly’s book Patents for Technology Transfer. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
As always, the IPKat is here to bring you a quick summary -- the 173rd edition of Never Too Late (for week ending 10th December 2017).Why is it so difficult to the make the case against counterfeiting (or does it just seem so)? [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:37 am by Wes Anderson
The Fourth Circuit dealt with this question in Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am by SHG
The fact that the New York City Police Department has openly and flagrantly chosen to ignore DeBour (that's the New York flavor of Terry v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
  That changed in Payne v. [read post]