Search for: "Quinn v. State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Quinn Harry S Truman Harry S. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Mirvis, William Savitt, and Sabastian V. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 6:54 am
Quinn, 573 U. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:01 pm
Loewy’s article United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 7:50 am
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California).That's why I just can't help but share a soundbite from today's Nokia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:35 pm
The Carrascos then sued the firm in California state court, alleging legal malpractice. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 8:29 am
But Daimler, represented by Quinn Emanuel's Dr. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 12:52 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to grant a conventional antisuit injunction, even though there would actually be valid policy reasons to do so.On two other occasions, this blog accurately predicted antisuit injunctions barring patent holders from the overseas enforcement of SEP injunctions: Microsoft v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 8:10 am
Richardson, et al. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 3:08 pm
In Quinn Estate v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:20 am
., on Friday, April 5, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Board leadership, Boards of Directors, California, Diversity, Institutional Investors, Institutional voting, Proxy advisors, SB 826, State law, Surveys Review and Analysis of 2018 U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
In the 2014 Harris v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:41 pm
In State of California ex rel. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
The Court stated in passing that the counter was required to be at least 36 inches in length, a misreading of the relevant standard.* Boitnott v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
The ongoing Qualcomm v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Instead, it doubled down yesterday in a way that I struggled to believe when I saw it this morning: for a patent infringement case in San Diego (Southern District of California) in which Qualcomm stands very little to gain after the judge determined that any damage claims would be limited to a period starting in the spring of 2017, the United States' #1 female lawyer, former Stanford Law School dean and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan name partner Kathleen M. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:26 pm
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California decided that Samsung's allegation of Huawei having breached its FRAND licensing obligations will be put before a San Francisco Jury in September, which is precisely what the Chinese plaintiff sought to avoid by means of a motion to strike its Korean rival's jury demand. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:11 am
Both the ITC and the United States District Court for the Southern District of California (Qualcomm's home court) had all the evidence on the table and determined that there is no infringement. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
Grewal used to serve as a United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of California. [read post]
