Search for: "R. Person" Results 21 - 40 of 200,143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 2:02 am
R (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Al Fawwaz) v Same [2009] EWHC 2068(Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 284 “When considering the lawfulness of extradition by reference to the likely prison conditions which a person, if extradited, would face upon conviction in the requesting country, the question whether the high threshold under art [...] [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 8:45 am by D Daniel Sokol
Martin Krčmář, Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Law explores Personal Liability for Anticompetitive Conduct in the Context of the Trade Agreement between EU and Colombia, Peru and Ecuador. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:44 am by CivPro Blogger
The South Carolina Law Review’s symposium issue, “Personal Jurisdiction for the Twenty-First Century: The Implications of McIntyre and Goodyear Dunlop Tires,” is now available online: Keynote Address Arthur R. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:17 am
R (MM (Burma) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (DT (Eritrea)) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 442; [2009] WLR (D) 166 “A person whose asylum claim had been finally determined in country A against him or her and who made a subsequent claim for asylum in country A came within the [...] [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 3:34 pm by Dave Abels
These often serve as important evidence in personal injury cases, including car accidents. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 12:46 pm by Michel-Adrien
Ithaka S+R, a U.S. research service that offers consulting services to libraries, scholarly societies, and universities, recently published a blog post about The Many Faces of Meetings - A Taxonomy of Emerging Models for In-Person and Hybrid Conferences:"The pandemic has made it clear that virtual meetings are not only possible, but make conferences more accessible to a broader, and more diverse audience. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:46 am
R v Tilley [2009] EWCA Crim 1426; [2009] WLR (D) 249 “Where a third party knew of a change that affected the benefit of a person claiming income support, he would be guilty of an offence if he dishonestly allowed the beneficiary to fail to report the change, but to commit the offence the third party [...] [read post]