Search for: "R. v. R."
Results 21 - 40
of 145,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2009, 2:02 am
R (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Al Fawwaz) v Same [2009] EWHC 2068(Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 284 “When considering the lawfulness of extradition by reference to the likely prison conditions which a person, if extradited, would face upon conviction in the requesting country, the question whether the high threshold under art [...] [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 am
R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98 “The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 1:44 am
R (Davies and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners; R (Gaines-Cooper) v Same [2010] EWCA Civ 83; [2010] WLR (D) 45 “The revenue had not been shown, in considering cases founded upon asserted non-resident status, to have altered its interpretation or application of relevant guidance material. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:48 am
R v Cottrell; R v Fletcher [2007] EWCA Crim 2016 “The Criminal Cases Review Commission should not normally refer a conviction where the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, would not normally extend time in which to renew an application for leave to appeal against conviction on the basis of a change in the law. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 1:49 am
R v R (Video Recording: Admissibility) [2008] EWCA Crim 678; [2008] WLR (D) 95 “A video recording of an interview given had been was properly admitted as evidence in chief at a criminal trial pursuant to a special measures direction made under s27 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, notwithstanding that no notification had been given by the Secretary of State under s18(2) of the Act that such measures were available. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:01 am
R v Montgomery “Where a prisoner who was on temporary release from prison pursuant to r 9 of the Prison Rules 1999 failed to return to prison at the expiry of his release period, he could not be said to have escaped from custody and could not therefore be guilty of the common law offence of escape from custody. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:17 am
R (MM (Burma) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (DT (Eritrea)) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 442; [2009] WLR (D) 166 “A person whose asylum claim had been finally determined in country A against him or her and who made a subsequent claim for asylum in country A came within the [...] [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 8:45 am
R v Bieber; [2008] WLR (D) 249 “An irreducible life sentence for murder, which was imposed because the offence was so serious that for the purposes of punishment and deterrence the offender must remain in prison for the rest of his days, did not result in detention that constituted inhuman or degrading treatment. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:40 am
The post Case Comment: R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice; R (AM) v DPP [2014] UKSC 38 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
20 May 2019, 11:43 am
Geoffrey R. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 2:29 am
The post Case Comment: R v Ahmad & Another; R v Fields & Others [2014] UKSC 36 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
13 Dec 2012, 7:00 pm
In R. v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:51 am
DIJULIO v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:14 am
” Though she didn’t write it, Wynette lived the lyrics of “D-I-V-O-R-C-E,” having been... [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:37 am
R v Geary [2010] WLR (D) 228 “The offence under s 328(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 of entering into or becoming concerned in an arrangement which a person knew or suspected facilitated the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property by or on behalf of another person, applied to property which was criminal at the time when the arrangement attached to it, and did not extend to property which was originally legitimate but became criminal only as a result… [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:27 am
Assistant Professor Shaun Fluker of the University of Calgary has posted a comment on the recent decision in R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
R v Mitchell (Northern Ireland), heard 7 July 2016. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:13 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 38 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice; R (AM) v DPP [2014] UKSC 38 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:06 am
: The SCC's decision in R v. [read post]
