Search for: "R. v. R." Results 21 - 40 of 145,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
If public-school students have a First Amendment right to wear black armbands at school in protest of the Vietnam War (in Tinker v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:45 am by JR Chaves
Quedaría el imaginativo cauce residual de solicitar en vía administrativa (al margen de la vía del art.29.2 LJCA) que por la Administración titular de la carretera se aprobase la reparación de ese tramo de carretera (o sea, que se dictase un acto administrativo, plan u orden de ejecución de obras, o incluso que se ejecuten materialmente) y [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Where evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), and the motion is not converted into one for summary judgment, the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not… [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Where evidentiary material is submitted and considered on a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), and the motion is not converted into one for summary judgment, the question becomes whether the plaintiff has a cause of action, not whether the plaintiff has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the plaintiff to be one is not a fact at all and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not… [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
This analysis is consistent with recently published decisions by both the General Court and the Boards of Appeal on the topic, inter alia: mataharispaclub v EUIPO - Rouha (SpaClubMatahari), Gugler France v EUIPO - Gugler (GUGLER), R 1320/2022-4, CELESTINO, and R 470/2023-2, TOYA (fig.).Therefore, it is crucial for bad faith applicants to prioritise thorough, high-quality evidence collection for a successful case. [read post]