Search for: "R.C." Results 21 - 40 of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2022, 12:08 pm by Stephen Bilkis
  In H.K. v R.C., the Supreme Court, New York County, was asked to decide whether a parent’s request to relocate over the objection of the noncustodial parent was in the best interests of the child. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:14 am by ---------------------------------
Because R.C. 4123.931 creates an independent right of recovery that would not otherwise exist, we conclude that a statutory subrogee’s claim under R.C. 4123.931(G) to recover its subrogation interest is governed by the six-year statute of limitations of R.C. 2307.05 for a liability created by statute. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:05 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that a claim asserted by the state under R.C. 4123.931(G) seeking subrogation (reimbursement) of workers’ compensation benefits from the proceeds of a lawsuit judgment or settlement recovered by an injured worker from a third party is subject to the six-year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.07 for claims “upon a liability created by statute. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 6:45 am by MBettman
“Irrespective of whether R.C. 2107.24 allows incompetent witnesses to establish that a document is a will, the voiding provision of R.C. 2107.15 applies to devises contained in any will. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:02 am
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today that in an employee-initiated action under the state’s “prevailing wage” statute, when a court finds that a contractor has failed to pay workers the prevailing wage for work on a public improvement project, the court must assess against the employer not only a judgment for the amount of the plaintiffs’ underpaid wages, but also the financial penalties set forth in R.C. 4115.10(A), unless the violation falls under one of two… [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 7:05 pm
Accordingly, the Office of the Ohio Public Defender will reimburse counties for counsel appointed to represent indigent persons in hearings pursuant to R.C. 2950.031(E), R.C. 2950.032(E), and R.C. 2950.11(F)(2). [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:44 am by MBettman
“…under the plain language of R.C. 3319.321(B), the school district is prohibited from releasing any personally identifying information about Betts without his consent. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:13 am by MBettman
“Because R.C. 109.78(D) and R.C. 2923.122(D)(1)(a) are unambiguous and do not conflict with each other, we must apply both statues as written unless and until the General Assembly directs otherwise by legislative action. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
” The court also backed up its decision by contrasting R.C. [read post]