Search for: "RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULES FOR USING THE OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM"
Results 21 - 40
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2022, 3:00 am
Carolyn Maloney sent the National Archives and Records Administration a request for further information on 15 boxes of records recovered from Trump’s resort. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
He admitted to 11 different violations of House rules, leading to a formal reprimand. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm
A handy rule of thumb in Fourth Amendment cases is that drivers always lose. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am
" In this post, I will describe the legal history of laws against bearing arms in "sensitive places," and will suggest some guidelines for courts to use. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm
Capitol, robbing him of the megaphone he used to communicate directly with more than 88 million supporters and critics. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 8:30 pm
Acting in a dispute over records related to President Trump’s Trump International Hotel, the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruled lawmakers can resort to the courts to enforce an obscure statute known as the seven-member rule. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 10:36 am
” Perhaps most surprising: despite early hype about the Apple-Google API, only Oklahoma, Alabama, South Carolina and Virginia currently plan to use the Silicon Valley compan [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Liberal Group Muddies Online Information Wars Politico – Alex Thompson | Published: 7/14/2020 CourierNewsroom.com, also known as Courier, was created and funded by the Democratic-aligned digital organization Acronym. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
The appeals court judges said despite the companies’ power, they cannot violate the First Amendment because it regulates only governments, not the private sector. [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Appeals Court Greenlights Emoluments Suit against Trump Politico – Josh Gerstein | Published: 5/14/2020 A lawsuit accusing President Trump of violating the Constitution by accepting foreign government money through his Washington, D.C. hotel can proceed to fact-gathering about Trump’s profits, a federal appeals court ruled. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Sineneng-Smith, arguing that “[u]nless and until Justice Thomas abandons the modern First Amendment entirely, one should regard with extreme skepticism his call for the re-examination of specific doctrines–like overbreadth and the rule of NY Times v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:05 pm
The 5-4 majority in the Supreme Court maintained that courts should not issue rulings that change election procedures so close to election day. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Constitution, First Amendment protections, the technical limitations of geotargeting, and even the very definition of advertising. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court for the second time to review rulings from lower courts that have said Congress and state prosecutors have a right to review his personal and business records. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Dow is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of chemicals and has a history of violating environmental rules. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The campaign released a plan to “get corporate money out of politics,” a proposal that would eliminate big-dollar fundraising for all federal elections, enact a constitutional amendment to declare campaign contributions are not speech, and take aim at the Democratic National Convention. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
After all, Supreme Court Rule 44 provides that, “[i]n the absence of extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant a petition for rehearing without first requesting a response. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
But FEC rules specify the personal use of campaign funds by “any person” is prohibited. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
It amended Family Court Act 812 to include it in the list of crimes that constitute a family offense and added it to Criminal Procedure Law 530. 11 The Civil Rights Law was amended to add new cause of action, in Civil Rights Law § 52–b titled Private right of action for unlawful dissemination or publication of an intimate image. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the state of Maryland and the District of Columbia, who joined together to file the suit, lacked legal standing to object to his alleged violations of the Constitution’s clauses prohibiting receipt of so-called emoluments while in office. [read post]
