Search for: "ROBERTS V COMMERCE"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Department of Commerce, Dkt. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 11:48 am
It turns out that Chief Justice Roberts was the only one of the nine justices to get NFIB v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 12:56 pm
Bus. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 12:52 pm
Roberts held (although "held" might be stating it too strongly) that the Commerce Clause does not authorize Congress to regulate the inactivity of individuals — the "act" of not buying health insurance — even if that inactivity impacts interstate commerce. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Mallory v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 10:23 am
New York granted a monopoly on steamboat traffic in that state's waters to Robert Fulton and Robert Livingston. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Mallory v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:20 am
The case I'm referring to is United Haulers v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 8:57 am
Here is the abstract: Chief Justice John Roberts argued, in NFIB v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:14 am
Roberts, Jr.; dissenting opinion by Justice Samuel A. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
Supreme Court dramatically altered the country’s E-commerce landscape with its decision in South Dakota v Wayfair, 585 U. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:18 pm
” For the Roberts Court, The Times continued, has proven to be a judicial entity ready to “replace law made by Congress with law made by justices. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:59 am
In Department of Commerce et al. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 8:32 am
Here is the gist: In the Obamacare case, NFIB v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:14 am
"That's the line-up on Department of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am
Chamber of Commerce filed an amicus brief in this case that supported the extension of First Amendment rights to inanimate entities. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:18 am
Robert M. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:22 pm
So the Roberts Court sides with the Chamber of Commerce frequently, and they say corporations have First Amendment rights. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 4:35 am
Robert’s opinion was unpersuasive in concluding that the minimum coverage provision was beyond the scope of the Commerce and Necessary and Proper Clauses. [read post]
