Search for: "ROOK v. ROOK" Results 21 - 40 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Rookes' TaleRoderick Bagshaw (University of Oxford, UK)6. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Rookes v Barnard (1964): 'Going off the Lines'Iain Field (University of Queensland, Australia)5. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 9:25 pm
However, I do want to encourage everyone to vote and would urge everyone to read fellow FOB (friend of Brandeis) Joe Rooks Rapport's front page article on the CJ's Sunday Forum. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 9:45 am
On this ground . . . an injunction is denied.Martinetti v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 5:39 am by Amy Howe
California Teachers Association, in which it has been asked to overrule its decision in Abood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:12 pm by Karen Dyck
Meads (2012 ABQB 571), discussed by Simon Fodden in Meads v. [read post]
Now a new judgment has been handed down from Associate Chief Justice Rooke in the Alberta Queen’s Bench, in which Justice Rooke summarizes the decision to bar an SRL from coming back to court without leave in Alberta’s new “inherent jurisdiction” as based on three heads of evidence: The litigant’s entire public dispute history, including litigation in other jurisdictions and non-judicial proceedings (at para 580) (and see Makis v Alberta… [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
The issue of OPCA litigants was addressed by Associate Chief Justice Rooke in his decision in Meads v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:05 am by Benjamin Wittes
But I have come to have an intense revulsion at the chess board manner in which we tend to talk about Syria (Assad to queen knight six, Russia bombs at queen bishop four, ISIS to king rook five, etc.). [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Rooke labelled “organized pseudo-legal commercial argument” or OPCA litigants. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 3:57 pm by ilawyer
In the context of abortion, the issue has landed in our nation’s Supreme Court, most notably in Roe v. [read post]