Search for: "ROWE v. MAINE STATE PRISON"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2016, 10:38 am
DOJ promulgated new regulations in 2013, which prompted this lawsuit under the Administrative Procedures Act brought by two public-defender agencies that represent state death-row prisoners -- the Habeas Corpus Resource Center in San Francisco, which represents California death-row prisoners, and the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Arizona, which represents death-row prisoners in that state under… [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
Let’s talk about the decision in Glossip v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm
United States, No. 11-99003 (Silverman with Wardlaw; partial dissent by Reinhardt)--- A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of a § 2255 post-conviction motion filed by a federal death-row prisoner, holding that defense counsels' guilt- and penalty-phase strategies were the product of professionally reasonable investigations under Strickland v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm
” Finally, analysts are now worried that the US-led campaign to crush ISIS may inadvertently help its main rival and the US’s arch-nemesis in the War on Terror: al Qaeda. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:17 am
But a skirmish This bail hearing was in fact only a skirmish in preparation for the main event. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:48 am
"US state grants death row inmate temporary reprieve," by Chantal Valery for AFP. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:00 pm
Ruhul Anam, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2012] EWHC 1770 (Admin) High Court reviews principles of assessment of damages in unlawful detention cases, rules that 2 years of substantive damages are to be awarded to prisoner. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:08 am
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Humphreys v Revenue and Customs [2012] UKSC 18 Supreme Court: paying child tax credit to “main” care giver not discriminatory (under art.14 ECHR) to father who was caring for the child 3 days per week. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:12 pm
This may have been the case in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
Natalie Maines. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm
This local custom does not address the main issue which is whether the sentence was legally imposed in the first place. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:25 pm
Ashley v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
The Attorney General, in a speech to Lincoln’s Inn, has stated his intent to limit the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights by intervening before the Grand Chamber in Scoppola v Italy (no. 3); another case concerning prisoners’ voting rights. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 10:48 pm
Solem v. [read post]
