Search for: "RUSHING v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA" Results 21 - 40 of 109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As I noted last week and major news outlets have also reported, the United States Supreme Court is poised next week to consider taking up the North Carolina partisan-gerrymandering case involving the so-called Independent-State- Legislature (ISL) theory. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
The defendant was stopped for expired registration in the Western District of North Carolina. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:03 pm by Jeff Welty
” That argument was made a little more difficult by the recent case of State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:07 am by Phil Dixon
Case summaries are also posted on the North Carolina Criminal Law Blog, here. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Some have suggested the court is more likely to grant blockbusters when they won’t be heard until next term, because they won’t have to rush the decision in the few months remaining before the court’s summer recess (or, perhaps more cynically, because they’ll have longer before having to confront high-profile, politically freighted decisions). [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm by Phil Dixon
The post Case Summaries: Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (Sept. 2021) appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But DeJoy’s family businesses continue to lease four North Carolina office buildings to XPO. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 1:00 pm by Phil Dixon
Marine, was standing in front of a hospital in Columbia, South Carolina, where his sister had recently been admitted. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Demisse Habteselasie
” After the Court handed down its decision in Shelby County, Texas and North Carolina swiftly enacted voter identification laws that restrict voting for some individuals. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by Joshua Holt
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The sense shift is perhaps via Medieval Latin confusion of impedicare with Latin impetere "attack, accuse" (see impetus), which is from the Latin verb petere "aim for, rush at" (from PIE root *pet- "to rush, to fly").The Middle English verb apechen, probably from an Anglo-French variant of the source of impeach, was used from early 14c. in the sense "to accuse (someone), to charge (someone with an offense). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
Common Cause, the challenge to North Carolina’s federal congressional map, and Lamone v. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 8:00 am by Cassandra Stubbs
But the North Carolina Supreme Court granted review in six cases where the petitioners were yanked from death row, to life without parole, and back again — without due process or new trials — after they had proved racism infected their cases and the state legislature repealed its anti-discrimination law. [read post]