Search for: "Rahim v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2022, 1:27 pm
On Thursday, in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
Kammen states that the government recognizes that the detainees have a habeas right, but also that the United States is not obligated to comply with an order from an Article III or military commission judge. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:45 am
The decision that will likely have the most impact on other cases involves the False Claims Act: United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:23 pm
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:17 am
And in Edmond v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am
Justice Stevens recognized, as the Court had indicated in the 1955 case of United States ex rel. [read post]
27 May 2014, 4:58 pm
Mark Martins, had this to say on the eve of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 8:10 am
§ 2241(e)(2) takes that jurisdiction away insofar as it precludes jurisdiction over “any [non-habeas] action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained by the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm
The chief prosecutor in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Orin Kerr responded to April Doss’s earlier post on United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:45 am
Petitioner Abd Al Rahim Hussein Al Nashiri (“the accused” or “Petitioner”) was arrested in 2002 in Dubai and has been held as a prisoner in Guantanamo Bay by the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 7:27 pm
Kammen cites Cuyler v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:22 pm
” He then asked, “What business does a case like that have in the courts of the United States? [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 7:21 am
Abdel Rahim’s house. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm
There’s no connection to the United States whatsoever. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
United States, a case about the harmless error standard. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
Data Protection Commissioner earlier this week—a ruling, which in addition to impacting data movement between the European Union and the United States, also made a splash on Lawfare. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
Nashiri has raised distinct challenges to the commission's authority over both of these episodes, arguing that the Cole bombing took place at a time when there was no armed conflict between the United States and al Qaeda, and that the attack on the M/V Limburg--a French-flag ship in the Gulf of Aden--cannot reasonably be connected to the (by then clearly established) non-international armed conflict between the United States and al Qaeda. [read post]
