Search for: "Railroad Company v. Houston" Results 21 - 40 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
In an op-ed Houston Chronicle (3/7) Thomas McGarity, a professor of law at The University of Texas at Austin, wrote, "The Supreme Court last week ended an acrimonious battle between large pharmaceutical companies and patients injured by inadequately labeled prescription drugs. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 6:54 am
In an op-ed Houston Chronicle (3/7) Thomas McGarity, a professor of law at The University of Texas at Austin, wrote, "The Supreme Court last week ended an acrimonious battle between large pharmaceutical companies and patients injured by inadequately labeled prescription drugs. [read post]
Oct. 23, 2009)(Hecht) (judgment on jury verdict in wrongful death case arising from train-truck collision reversed based on federal preemption) MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY D/B/A UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:42 am by Beth Graham
Meanwhile, Yellow Cab also contracted with the Greater Houston Transportation Company (“GHTC”) to provide van drivers for METROLift. [read post]
12 May 2021, 4:45 am by Isreal Miller
The Texas Railroad Commission had originally sued Timber Creek Oil Company and Mr. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 12:05 pm by Beth Graham
On appeal, the oil company argued that “the Texas Railroad Commission had exclusive or primary jurisdiction over the dispute. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
High Point, Thomasville and Denton Railroad Company, 142 F. 3d 769 (1998)), the panel majority agreed that Consol failed to show that Georgia Power Company acted with the necessary intent to create “arranger” liability for itself. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
BERNARD, DECEASED, AND FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
BERNARD, DECEASED, AND FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Just this week, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in First American Financial Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, the In the Matter of: Perez v. [read post]