Search for: "Randolph v. B " Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
The Court of Appeals determined that the trial court did not err because the facts in both cases were similar enough to be admitted for 404(b) purposes. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
In April 2019, Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen—the most recent Senate-confirmed secretary of homeland security—tried to amend the existing succession order (see Enclosure B to the linked letter to the comptroller general from the House Committee on Homeland Security, which in turn refers to Executive Order 13753 for a hierarchy for DHS succession) right before she resigned, in order to make Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleenan the next in line to be the acting… [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:15 am by Giles Peaker
This had been proposed as rule of law in some cases, but was better considered as an implied term, following Stirling v Maitland (1864) 5 B & S 840. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm by Josh Blackman
(Fun fact: John Randolph Tucker, the namesake of the Tucker Act, was the grandson of St. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent ltd, heard 10 October 2019. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent ltd, heard 10 October 2019. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
Adler, Case Western Reserve University School of Law Long a fixture of administrative law, Chevron v. [read post]