Search for: "Raphael v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2019, 9:00 pm by Karen Tani
From History News Network: Ray Raphael on what two of the Constitution's framers would have thought about a wealth tax.Balkinization recently featured a series of posts on David Schwartz’s The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
Accordingly, we conclude that Penal Law § 240.30(1) is unconstitutional under both the State and Federal Constitutions, and we vacate defendants’ convictions on these counts. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:30 am
Supreme Court in a sit-down with CNN to be aired Sunday, adding that he was particularly "sorry" about the conservative majority's decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:49 am by Parisa Zangeneh
In today’s International Court of Justice judgment in the case of Croatia v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 4:08 am
Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908)(upholding woman protective labor legislation)Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908)(creating legal fiction of suing state attorney general to permit suits against states and get around Hans v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 3:25 am by Howard Friedman
Raphael's Academy is the alma mater of a number of influential city and state officials. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 3:19 pm by Hilary Hurd
Strawbridge punts the question and suggests that the court follow the model of United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, the kind of Norwich Pharmacal order sought by the plaintiff in Muwema had been granted in the High Court in London as long ago as 2008 (see Applause Store Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (24 July 2008)) and was recently granted in Nova Scotia in Olsen v Facebook 2016 NSSC 155 (CanLII) (17 June 2016)). [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Alan Raphael analyzes yesterday’s opinion in Howes v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
” In the Virginia Bar Association Journal, Stuart Raphael discusses the legacy of Loving v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:17 am by Scott Michelman
And it seems out of step with the Court’s general practice, stated in its rules, that certiorari is “rarely granted when the asserted error consists of … the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law. [read post]