Search for: "Rappaport v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am by David Gans
  First, Rappaport asserts that the Fourteenth Amendment is a limit on the actions of state government, not Congress, and thus federal statutes, like the Freedman’s Bureau Act, were not subject to the Fourteenth Amendment’s equality requirement. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Before Roe: the abortionist Nathan Rappaport (Slate). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:51 am by Mike Rappaport
After all, Scalia could simply be saying that state laws could protect women. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:52 am by Harold O'Grady
States have the right to call an Article V convention without the concurrence of the Congress whenever two-thirds of the states wish to participate. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 3:34 pm by Will Baude
But I am still surprised when I see people make this mistake, or see people who assume that Adarand and Bolling v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
At The Originalism Blog, Michael Rappaport analyzes the government’s cert. petition in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Cormac Early
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr has video of a recent conference of privacy law scholars on the “mosaic theory” of Fourth Amendment searches, which was embraced by the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
[Mike Rappaport, Law and Liberty] Tags: Article V, constitutional law, Virginia [read post]