Search for: "Re v. PERS"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 11:42 am
Mr C’s position was that of a person in ‘accommodation plus’ need, as per R (Aburas) v London Borough of Southwark (2019) EWHC 2754 (Admin). [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:30 pm
There were 100 voting delegates, two per state. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
25 May 2024, 10:39 am
” Sarkissian v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
In cases involving children, the familiar Article 8/10 judicial “balancing exercise” is conducted with regard to an additional legal principle – that “[w]here the best interests of the child clearly favour a certain course, that course should be followed, unless countervailing reasons of considerable force displace them” (K v News Group Newspapers [2011] 1 WLR 1827, per Ward LJ, [19]). [read post]
24 May 2024, 1:49 am
Whilst the conservatives have left us short of some 300,000 new homes per year will Labour deliver affordable housing that is desperately required if they come into to power? [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:54 pm
v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:13 pm
” Case citation: Robertson v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:28 am
From Tuesday's decision in Robertson v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
Extreme heat is defined as at least 48 health-threatening heat days per year. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:15 pm
Many insurance adjusters are fine people who want to do the right thing, but their insurance companies require them to frequently deny claims if possible because they’re concerned with the bottom-line. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
This term stated that customers must “tell us if anything changes while you’re insured with us” (the Notification Clause) (our emphasis) and was included within Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs) issued with approximately 1,377,900 contracts for home and contents insurance policies. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
As per Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 2:55 am
In the pharmaceutical field, for example, the prior disclosure of a specific chemical structure of a drug destroys the novelty of a claim for that drug per se. [read post]
18 May 2024, 7:41 am
Mular v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:37 pm
” In re Xencor, Inc., No. 2023-2048 (Fed. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
Sixth Circuit: Actually, you're right (as to some of the money). [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
Circuit’s application of the Fitzgerald test in Blassingame v. [read post]