Search for: "Reason v. Taylor"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2017, 4:31 pm
The decision in Dawson-Damer v Taylor Wessing LLP ([2017] EWCA Civ 74) reverses a decision by the High Court that the law firm Taylor Wessing had not breached the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) by refusing to carry out searches on grounds of proportionality, legal privilege and improper purpose. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 6:30 am
Barzun, University of Virginia School of Law, has posted Quentin Skinner v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
In his latest broadside against Judge Sonia Sotomayor, Stuart Taylor revisits Ricci v DeStefano. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm
Determining mandatory subjects of Taylor Law negotiations Town of Haverstraw v Newman, 75 A.D.2d 874 The Appellate Division sustained PERB’S determination that “legal insurance”, family sick leave, uniform cleaning allowances and a safety clause in connection with Taylor Law negotiations between the Town and its police officer’s union were mandatory subjects of collective bargaining. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:45 am
” Judge Kavanaugh’s 10-page opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The post Spencer v Taylor- Some Analysis appeared first on Nearly Legal. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
If Taylor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am
Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:17 am
And at the Supreme Court, it’s the rationale for a steady string of summary reversals, including yesterday’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
Tests for determining the “arbitrability” of Taylor Law contract provisionsOdessa-Montour CSD v Odessa-Montour Teachers Asso., 271 AD2d 931The Odessa-Montour decision by the Appellate Division, Third Department applied the guidelines set out in the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Watertown City School District v Watertown Education Association, 93 NY2d 132. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm
Taylor, 509 F.3d 839, 841 (7th Cir. 2007) ("Taylor I"); United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:56 am
By Eric Goldman Taylor v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:03 am
Some of these overpayments related to the period of time in which Carlton was a member of the Taylor Clark VAT group, and for that reason HMRC paid the relevant requested sums to Taylor Clark. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
In Nakkhumpun v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:41 pm
Sandell v Taylor-Listug (California Court of Appeals No. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:37 am
Taylor, 2008 U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 4:09 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 7:31 am
Washington v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 1:27 pm
Nor could Kimmel be faulted for supposedly inciting threats by third parties, since there's no reason to think his speech was intended to and likely to produce imminent threats of violence (see Brandenburg v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 11:12 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
